November Garden Beauties

My garden is still delighting me. I took these photos this week. I'm posting them and participating in SOOC Saturday at Slurping Life.

Lamb's EarLamb's Ear</span>

Foxglove: why on earth is this blooming right now??Foxglove: why on earth is this blooming right now??</span>

SOOC is short speak for Straight Out Of the Camera. Since getting my new camera almost all my photos that I've posted here and on Flickr are SOOC. I'm just so pleased with what this camera can do compared to what I had before I don't give much consideration to processing and editing. Maybe the photos would benefit from a boost here and there - oh well, they are what they are.

I actually want to hone my skill as a SOOC photography. I only have so much time and I'd rather be taking, posting and sharing photos than editing. My little computer is struggling with all these RAW files and all that processing takes time that I don't have.

Not that I don't love edited photography, I do. Some of my favorite photos from other photographers are quite processed. It's just not my thing right now.

That's my story. And I'm sticking to it. Till I change my mind.

Filed Under

« Seasonal soapmaking
Nature Study, FIMBY Style »
  • Barbara

    Barbara on Nov. 15, 2008, 4:22 p.m.

    Plant photos really appeal to me. Your 'story' about trying to get photos SOOC really appeals to me, too. Time is precious.

    And 'short speak' is a new term to me, too. I'm gonna use that one soon, too.

    Thanks for 3 'news' in my blog life!

    reply

  • laura - dolcepics

    laura - dolcepics on Nov. 15, 2008, 8:01 p.m.

    Hi Renee! These are absolutely gorgeous! You now if you're not so much into editing, then perhaps you should try shooting in RAW+JPG so that you still have the RAW files if you want to process them later but you will also have the JPG files for immediate posting. RAW files are recorded in black and white and result in flat images. In-camera JPG's are adjusted in milliseconds once you snap a picture. You might be pleasantly surprised at the difference and won't even have to do any post processing. :)

    reply

    • renee

      renee on Nov. 15, 2008, 9:26 p.m.

      huh?? I'm slow on the uptake. I guess my photo software Bibble does process the photos. By SOOC I mean I'm not tweaking curves, boosting, saturating or otherwise. Whatever Bibble does I just use that. All I know (which isn't much) is that my RAW photos are "richer" than JPG. They look better so that's what I shoot in.

      -- Renee

      reply

  • laura - dolcepics

    laura - dolcepics on Nov. 15, 2008, 11:30 p.m.

    Hi Renee,

    In my book, as long as you're not tweaking curves or adjusting anything it's SOOC. We can't upload RAW files directly so we have to export as JPG, which doesn't count as 'processing' in the editing sense. What I was talking about is when we shoot JPG in-camera, the camera actually does a bit of processing.

    This is a good article to read about RAW and JPG in-camera: http://www.popphoto.com/howto/2196/jpeg-vs-raw-the-advantages-and-disadvantages-explained.html

    So those who shoot JPG, will have images that should be a bit more contrasty compared to our RAW files. But, for these purposes, I'd say those who shoot JPG still have SOOC images since that's what it looks like when it comes out of the camera.

    That's why I suggest that you might want to shoot RAW+JPG where you will record both formats. They're both still "straight-out-of-camera" but the JPG should look a bit better.

    I hope that makes sense... I'm battling a bad cold right now so I might babble a bit. hehe

    reply

  • Kimberly

    Kimberly on Nov. 16, 2008, 1:37 a.m.

    I'm with Barbara. I've never heard the term "short speak" and I love it!

    Lovely photos. The Lamb's Ear in particular. Was ever a plant more aptly named? :)

    reply

  • Julie

    Julie on Nov. 16, 2008, 2:32 a.m.

    These are beautiful! (I tried to comment before, not sure if it went through and is awaiting moderation or what...)

    Have a nice weekend! Julie

    reply

You can subscribe to comments on this article using this form.

If you have already commented on this article, you do not need to do this, as you were automatically subscribed.